.svg)
You're staring at your attribution dashboard, and the numbers don't add up. Your first-touch model gives all the credit to a blog post someone read four weeks ago. Your last-touch model credits everything to the retargeting ad they clicked yesterday. But you know the real story is somewhere in between—a 30-day journey with a dozen touchpoints that somehow led to a $5,000 purchase.
Which touchpoint actually mattered most? The educational content that first caught their attention, or the timely retargeting ad that sealed the deal?
This is where time decay attribution comes in. Instead of forcing you to choose between first and last touch, it acknowledges every interaction while giving progressively more weight to the touchpoints closest to conversion. It's a model that mirrors how human decision-making actually works: recent experiences influence us more than distant memories.
For marketers running multi-channel campaigns with clear conversion goals, understanding time decay attribution isn't just academic—it's essential for making smarter budget decisions and optimizing campaigns based on what actually drives conversions.
Time decay attribution is a multi-touch model that assigns credit to every touchpoint in a customer journey, but with a critical twist: interactions closer to the conversion event receive exponentially more credit than earlier ones.
Think of it like this: when someone buys a new laptop, they might remember researching specs three weeks ago, but the YouTube review they watched yesterday and the promotional email that arrived this morning are fresh in their mind. Those recent touchpoints likely had more influence on their final decision to click "buy now."
The model operates on a half-life principle—typically set at 7 days in most platforms. Here's how that works: a touchpoint occurring 7 days before conversion receives 50% of the credit it would have gotten if it happened at the moment of conversion. A touchpoint 14 days out? That gets 25%. At 21 days, you're down to 12.5%, and so on.
This exponential decay reflects a fundamental truth about human psychology: recency bias is real. We're wired to give more weight to recent experiences when making decisions. The email you read this morning influences you more than the blog post you skimmed three weeks ago, even if both contained valuable information.
To understand why this matters, contrast it with linear attribution. Linear models split credit equally across all touchpoints—so if someone had 10 interactions before converting, each gets exactly 10% of the credit. That sounds fair, but it ignores timing entirely.
Imagine you're running a flash sale that ends in 48 hours. A customer sees your initial announcement email, then gets reminded by a retargeting ad 24 hours before the deadline, and finally converts after clicking a last-minute SMS alert. Linear attribution gives equal credit to all three. But realistically, that SMS reminder probably had far more influence on the immediate purchase decision than the announcement email from two days earlier.
Time decay attribution captures this reality. It says: "Yes, that announcement email mattered—it started the journey. But the SMS that arrived right before they bought? That mattered more."
This approach is particularly valuable when you're trying to understand which channels and campaigns are actually pushing people over the finish line. If you're spending heavily on awareness campaigns but your time decay data shows that retargeting and direct emails consistently earn the highest credit, that's actionable intelligence. It might mean your awareness efforts are working, but you need stronger follow-up sequences to capitalize on that initial interest.
The model also helps you avoid the trap of over-investing in last-touch channels. Sure, retargeting ads often get the final click, but time decay shows you the full sequence of events that made that final click possible. It gives credit where credit is due—just proportionally weighted by timing.
Let's get into the mechanics. Understanding the math behind time decay attribution helps you interpret the data correctly and adjust settings to match your business reality.
The core formula assigns credit based on time elapsed from each touchpoint to the conversion event. The further back in time a touchpoint occurred, the less credit it receives—and this decrease follows an exponential curve, not a linear one.
Here's a concrete example. Imagine a customer journey with five touchpoints over 14 days before conversion:
Day 1: Customer clicks a Facebook ad and visits your site (13 days before conversion)
Day 4: Customer returns via organic search and reads a blog post (10 days before conversion)
Day 8: Customer clicks an email campaign link (6 days before conversion)
Day 12: Customer sees a retargeting ad on Instagram (2 days before conversion)
Day 14: Customer clicks a Google Shopping ad and converts (0 days before conversion)
Using a standard 7-day half-life, here's how credit gets distributed:
The Google Shopping ad on Day 14 gets the highest credit because it happened at conversion time. Let's say that's 100% of its potential value.
The Instagram retargeting ad from Day 12 (2 days before conversion) gets roughly 81% of full credit—it's recent enough that decay hasn't significantly reduced its value.
The email click from Day 8 (6 days before conversion) sits just inside the 7-day half-life window, so it receives approximately 52% of full credit.
The organic search visit from Day 4 (10 days before conversion) crosses the half-life threshold, dropping to about 37% of full credit.
The initial Facebook ad from Day 1 (13 days before conversion) is nearly two half-life periods away, receiving roughly 27% of full credit.
When you add up all these weighted values and normalize them to 100%, you might see something like: Google Shopping 28%, Instagram retargeting 23%, email 15%, organic search 13%, Facebook ad 21%.
Now here's where it gets interesting: changing the half-life setting dramatically shifts these percentages.
If you switch to a 14-day half-life instead of 7-day, you're telling the model that touchpoints stay relevant longer. In this scenario, earlier interactions retain more credit. The Facebook ad from Day 1 might jump from 21% to 26% of total credit, while the Google Shopping ad's share decreases proportionally.
Why does this matter? Because your half-life setting should match your actual sales cycle. If you're selling enterprise software with 60-day sales cycles, a 7-day half-life is far too aggressive—it essentially ignores all the crucial early-stage nurturing that happened weeks before conversion. You'd want a 21-day or even 30-day half-life to properly credit those awareness and consideration touchpoints.
Conversely, if you're running flash sales or promoting limited-time offers with 48-hour decision windows, a 7-day half-life might be too generous to older touchpoints. You might want a 3-day or even 1-day half-life to heavily favor the final push that drove immediate action.
Most attribution platforms let you adjust these settings, but many marketers never touch the defaults. That's a mistake. The half-life you choose fundamentally changes which channels and campaigns appear to be "working." Always align your time decay settings with your typical customer journey length.
Time decay attribution isn't universally applicable. Like any attribution model, it shines in certain scenarios and falls flat in others. Understanding how to choose the right attribution model starts with knowing your business context.
The model works best for businesses with short to medium sales cycles—typically under 30 days. Think e-commerce, consumer services, SaaS trials that convert quickly, or any business where customers move from awareness to purchase within a few weeks.
Why? Because in shorter cycles, recent touchpoints genuinely do have outsized influence. When someone decides to buy running shoes, the review video they watched yesterday and the discount code they received this morning matter more than the brand awareness ad they saw three weeks ago. Time decay captures this reality accurately.
The model is particularly effective for promotional campaigns and limited-time offers. When you're running a Black Friday sale or a 48-hour flash promotion, urgency is the entire game. Time decay attribution shows you exactly which channels and messages are driving those time-sensitive conversions. It helps you understand whether your last-minute email reminders, retargeting ads, or SMS alerts are actually pushing people to buy before the clock runs out.
Seasonal marketing campaigns also benefit from time decay analysis. If you're a retailer running holiday campaigns, you want to know which touchpoints in the final week before purchase day are most influential. Time decay gives you that visibility without completely ignoring the awareness-building work you did earlier in the season.
For performance marketers focused on direct response and conversion optimization, time decay provides actionable intelligence. It tells you which channels consistently appear in high-credit positions near conversion, helping you allocate budget toward the tactics that close deals rather than just starting conversations.
But here's where time decay falls short: long, complex B2B sales cycles.
If your typical customer journey spans 90 days with multiple stakeholders, research phases, and consideration periods, time decay attribution will systematically undervalue the early touchpoints that actually initiated the entire process. That whitepaper someone downloaded three months ago? The webinar that first introduced your solution? The thought leadership content that built trust? Time decay gives these crucial awareness-stage interactions minimal credit because they're far from the conversion event.
In B2B especially, early touchpoints often play an outsized role in shaping buyer perception and consideration set. A prospect might discover your solution through a podcast interview in January, do extensive research in February and March, and finally convert in April after a sales call. Time decay would credit that final sales touchpoint heavily while barely acknowledging the podcast that started everything.
The model also struggles with considered purchases where customers do extensive upfront research but then act quickly once they're ready. Think major appliances, cars, or B2B software. The research phase might span weeks, but the final decision happens in 48 hours. Time decay would overweight those final two days and undervalue all the educational content that actually informed the purchase decision.
Understanding time decay means understanding how it compares to other attribution approaches. Each model tells a different story about your marketing performance, and a thorough comparison of attribution models reveals these distinctions clearly.
First-Touch Attribution: This model gives 100% credit to the first interaction that brought a customer into your ecosystem. It's an awareness-focused model that shows you which channels are best at introducing new prospects to your brand.
Time decay differs fundamentally here. While first-touch says "only the beginning matters," time decay says "the beginning matters, but recent interactions matter more." If you're trying to justify investment in top-of-funnel awareness campaigns, first-touch makes them look heroic. Time decay gives them credit, but proportionally less than conversion-stage touchpoints.
Last-Touch Attribution: The opposite extreme—100% credit goes to the final touchpoint before conversion. This is a conversion-focused model that shows which channels are closing deals.
Time decay is more nuanced. Instead of ignoring everything except the last click, it acknowledges that the final touchpoint was probably important but so were the 2-3 interactions immediately before it. Last-touch makes retargeting and direct channels look like superstars while ignoring the nurture sequence that made them effective. Time decay shows the full picture of how you closed the deal.
Linear Attribution: Every touchpoint gets equal credit regardless of when it occurred. This is the "everyone gets a trophy" model—fair but not necessarily accurate.
Time decay recognizes that not all touchpoints are equally influential. Linear attribution might tell you that 10 touchpoints each deserve 10% credit. Time decay says the three touchpoints in the final week before conversion probably deserve 60% of the credit combined, with the earlier seven splitting the remaining 40%. It's a more realistic representation of how marketing influence actually works.
Position-Based Attribution: Also called U-shaped attribution, this model gives 40% credit to the first touchpoint, 40% to the last touchpoint, and splits the remaining 20% among everything in between.
This is where things get interesting. Position-based attribution assumes that beginnings and endings matter most—the first touch that created awareness and the last touch that drove conversion. Time decay instead assumes that recency matters most, regardless of position. A touchpoint three days before conversion gets more credit than the first touchpoint, even though position-based would heavily favor that first interaction.
When does time decay outperform these alternatives? When you're running campaigns where momentum and recency genuinely drive conversions—promotional marketing, seasonal campaigns, limited-time offers, and shorter sales cycles where recent touchpoints have clear influence.
When does it fall short? When you need to justify investment in awareness campaigns (first-touch is better), when you want to understand which channels initiate valuable customer relationships (position-based is better), or when you're dealing with long consideration periods where early education matters enormously (linear or position-based might be more appropriate).
Here's the truth: no single attribution model tells the complete story. The smartest approach is comparing multiple models to understand different aspects of your marketing performance. Time decay shows you what's driving final conversions. First-touch shows you what's building awareness. Position-based shows you what's starting and finishing customer journeys. Look at all three, and you'll make better decisions than relying on any single perspective.
Understanding time decay attribution conceptually is one thing. Actually implementing it accurately is another challenge entirely.
The foundation of accurate time decay tracking is complete touchpoint capture across every channel. You cannot accurately weight touchpoints by time if you're missing half of them. This means you need tracking in place for paid ads, organic search, social media, email, SMS, direct traffic, offline interactions, and any other channel where customers encounter your brand.
Most platforms offer some version of time decay attribution, but they only track what they can see. Google Analytics shows you time decay credit across web touchpoints, but it doesn't know about your email campaigns unless they're properly tagged. Your email platform shows email performance but doesn't connect to ad clicks or CRM events. This fragmentation is the biggest obstacle to accurate time decay analysis.
Here's what you actually need: a system that connects your ad platforms, CRM, website analytics, and offline data into a unified view of each customer journey. Without this integration, your time decay model is working with incomplete information—and incomplete information leads to incorrect credit distribution.
Cross-device tracking adds another layer of complexity. If a customer clicks your Facebook ad on their phone, researches on their laptop, and converts on their tablet, you need to connect those three devices to a single customer journey. Otherwise, your time decay model treats them as three separate people, completely destroying the accuracy of your credit distribution.
Offline touchpoint integration matters too, especially for businesses with physical locations or phone sales teams. If someone sees your billboard, visits your store, talks to a sales rep, and then converts online, that offline interaction needs to be part of your time decay calculation. Many attribution systems struggle here because they can't easily capture and timestamp offline events.
Cookie limitations and privacy regulations make this even harder. With third-party cookies disappearing and tracking restrictions tightening, capturing complete customer journeys requires more sophisticated approaches like server-side tracking and first-party data strategies.
This is where comprehensive marketing attribution modeling software becomes essential. These systems are built specifically to solve the fragmentation problem. They connect to your ad accounts, CRM, email platform, website, and other data sources, then stitch together complete customer journeys using first-party data and identity resolution.
Once you have complete journey data, applying time decay weighting becomes straightforward. The platform timestamps each touchpoint, calculates time elapsed to conversion, applies the decay formula based on your chosen half-life, and distributes credit accordingly.
But here's the critical insight: the accuracy of your time decay attribution is only as good as your data completeness. If you're missing 30% of touchpoints because your tracking isn't comprehensive, your time decay model will give incorrect credit to the touchpoints you do capture. It's not that the model is wrong—it's that the data feeding the model is incomplete.
Before you trust time decay insights to guide budget decisions, audit your tracking. Can you see every touchpoint? Are cross-device journeys being connected? Are offline interactions being captured? If the answer to any of these is no, fix your tracking infrastructure before you start optimizing based on attribution data.
Once you have accurate time decay attribution data, the real work begins: using those insights to improve campaign performance and allocate budget more effectively.
Start by identifying which channels consistently appear in high-credit positions close to conversion. Look at your time decay reports and ask: which channels are earning 15%+ credit on average? These are your conversion drivers—the channels that are actively pushing people to take action, not just creating awareness.
You might discover that your retargeting campaigns earn 25% of credit in time decay models while your prospecting campaigns earn only 8%. That doesn't mean prospecting is worthless—it means retargeting is more effective at closing deals with people who are already familiar with your brand. This insight should inform your budget split between prospecting and retargeting, but it shouldn't cause you to abandon prospecting entirely.
Time decay data is particularly valuable for optimizing retargeting sequences. If your model shows that touchpoints 3-5 days before conversion consistently earn high credit, that tells you when to intensify your retargeting efforts. You might adjust your retargeting ad frequency to increase impressions during that critical 3-5 day window when people are most likely to convert.
Email campaign timing also benefits from time decay insights. If your data shows that email clicks 24-48 hours before conversion earn outsized credit, you can optimize send times to hit inboxes during that high-intent window. For promotional campaigns, this might mean sending reminder emails exactly 48 hours before an offer expires rather than a week in advance.
Budget allocation becomes more sophisticated when you move beyond raw touchpoint counts to time-weighted performance. A channel might appear in 40% of converting customer journeys but earn only 15% of time decay credit—meaning it's present but not particularly influential near the conversion event. Another channel might appear in only 20% of journeys but earn 25% of time decay credit—indicating that when it's involved, it's highly influential.
Allocate budget based on time-weighted credit, not just presence. The channel earning 25% of credit despite appearing in fewer journeys deserves more investment because it's demonstrably driving conversions when it's active.
Use time decay data to identify underperforming channels that need optimization or should be cut. If a channel consistently appears early in customer journeys but earns minimal time decay credit, it might be good at awareness but weak at conversion. That's not necessarily bad—awareness matters—but you should recognize it for what it is and not expect direct conversion performance from that channel.
Finally, combine time decay insights with other attribution models for a complete picture. Time decay tells you what's driving conversions. First-touch tells you what's building your pipeline. Look at both together to understand which channels are best at starting customer relationships and which are best at closing them. Then build your strategy accordingly: invest in first-touch leaders for growth and time decay leaders for conversion optimization.
Time decay attribution gives you a powerful lens for understanding which marketing touchpoints drive final conversion decisions. By weighting recent interactions more heavily than distant ones, it reflects the psychological reality of how timing influences purchase behavior.
But choosing the right attribution model isn't about finding the "correct" one—it's about selecting the model that best aligns with your sales cycle, marketing objectives, and business reality. Time decay works brilliantly for short sales cycles, promotional campaigns, and scenarios where recency genuinely drives action. It struggles with long consideration periods where early awareness plays an outsized role.
The real power comes from using multiple attribution models together. Time decay shows you what's closing deals. First-touch shows you what's building your pipeline. Position-based shows you what's starting and finishing customer journeys. Compare all three, and you'll understand your marketing performance from every angle.
Most importantly, remember that attribution accuracy depends entirely on data completeness. You cannot weight touchpoints correctly if you're missing half of them. Invest in comprehensive tracking that captures every interaction across every channel, connects cross-device journeys, and integrates offline touchpoints. Only then will your time decay insights actually reflect reality.
Ready to elevate your marketing game with precision and confidence? Discover how Cometly's AI-driven recommendations can transform your ad strategy—Get your free demo today and start capturing every touchpoint to maximize your conversions.
Learn how Cometly can help you pinpoint channels driving revenue.
.svg)
Network with the top performance marketers in the industry
